# Simulation Modeling Toolkit (SMTK)

**URL:** https://discourse.kitware.com/c/smtk/6.md?page=8

[Latest](https://discourse.kitware.com/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discourse.kitware.com/categories.md)

**Page:** 9

---

## [ParaView error "Could not locate server on which the source is being added."](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/paraview-error-could-not-locate-server-on-which-the-source-is-being-added/110)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 7\
**Last updated:** [May 25, 2018, 2:03pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/paraview-error-could-not-locate-server-on-which-the-source-is-being-added/110 "2018-05-25T14:03:52Z")

</div>

@Haocheng\_Liu I did eventually find the exact error I ran into with modelbuilder 6; in my case, modelbuilder would start but when the pqBehavior instance was requested or when a reader was created (I can’t recall which),…

---

## [Refactoring](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/refactoring/111)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [May 23, 2018, 9:53pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/refactoring/111 "2018-05-23T21:53:05Z")

</div>

@Bob\_Obara @tj.corona I haven’t used it, but the refactorial project — which uses clang’s libtooling library to perform refactors — might make it easier to do some of the larger class renames. When I look at what git gre…

---

## [Compile-time vs Runtime Manager descriptions](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/compile-time-vs-runtime-manager-descriptions/103)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@tj.corona](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/tj.corona)\
**Replies:** 14\
**Last updated:** [May 9, 2018, 7:47pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/compile-time-vs-runtime-manager-descriptions/103 "2018-05-09T19:47:10Z")

</div>

I recently started a branch that provides a uniform API for plugins to register things to different SMTK managers (currently resource::Manager and operation::Manager, but more to come!). The pattern I used requires the m…

---

## [Extending the auxiliary geometry extension](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/extending-the-auxiliary-geometry-extension/100)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [May 5, 2018, 3:27am UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/extending-the-auxiliary-geometry-extension/100 "2018-05-05T03:27:02Z")

</div>

@Haocheng\_Liu I see at least part of the problem you have with the RGG session. It needs not only to indicate that the .rgg file can be loaded but also to add it to the VTK cache. Since it adds dependencies beyond VTK, i…

---

## [Operation view](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/operation-view/94)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [April 26, 2018, 6:05pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/operation-view/94 "2018-04-26T18:05:46Z")

</div>

All, but especially @Bob\_Obara: I’ve got selections in modelbuilder generating a list of available operations and have come up with a few questions on the operation panel. Here’s what I’m planning: In real life, the…

---

## [Plugin loading](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/plugin-loading/92)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [April 23, 2018, 1:28pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/plugin-loading/92 "2018-04-23T13:28:07Z")

</div>

@tj.corona How do you feel about a test that dlopens/closes/opens/closes plugin libraries to verify that the crazy ParaView library thing doesn’t cause problems down the road?

---

## [Delaunay extension](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/delaunay-extension/88)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [April 16, 2018, 3:24pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/delaunay-extension/88 "2018-04-16T15:24:34Z")

</div>

@tj.corona Shouldn’t there be an “environment” library for smtkDelaunayExt? I don’t see one and the tests appear to manually register the operator to an operation manager.

---

## [Homebrew on macos](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/homebrew-on-macos/75)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [April 16, 2018, 1:00pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/homebrew-on-macos/75 "2018-04-16T13:00:04Z")

</div>

It’s come up that homebrew now only provides python3. Unless you have a previous homebrew python 2.7, there’s no way to build SMTK without building your own python. (The macos-provided python will not work due to securit…

---

## [Operator group registration](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/operator-group-registration/90)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [April 16, 2018, 12:54pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/operator-group-registration/90 "2018-04-16T12:54:05Z")

</div>

While working to get a list of available operators from the selection, I’ve run across a curious issue in smtk/bridge/polygon/RegisterSession.cxx at line 61: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmb/smtk/blob/master/smtk/bridge/p…

---

## [Operations based on a selection](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/operations-based-on-a-selection/87)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 7\
**Last updated:** [April 12, 2018, 1:38pm UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/operations-based-on-a-selection/87 "2018-04-12T13:38:22Z")

</div>

In adding operations to modelbuilder v6, we want to improve on the drop-down list in v5. One thing we want to do is present operations that can be applied to the currently selected components. However, this seemingly sim…

---

## [from\_json() for attribute items](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/from-json-for-attribute-items/77)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@dcthomp](https://discourse.kitware.com/u/dcthomp)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [April 11, 2018, 3:07am UTC](https://discourse.kitware.com/t/from-json-for-attribute-items/77 "2018-04-11T03:07:02Z")

</div>

@Haocheng\_Liu I’m writing from\_json() and to\_json() methods for a new subclass of smtk::attribute::Item (ReferenceItem which holds references to smtk::resource::PersistentObject) and want to understand why the signature…

[Previous page](https://discourse.kitware.com/c/smtk/6.md?page=7)
